Bear's Gridiron in Australia Forums




Junior World Cup qualifier

Author Message
 Posted 28/01/2009 6:16:22 AM
Forum Guru

Forum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum Guru

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2/12/2011 8:30:18 PM
Posts: 52, Visits: 417
It seems that some people didn't get the information from their GA reps that the camp leading up to the game was for any player age eligible nominated by their club coaches and submitted to the Head Coach for consideration. The original camp had over 90 players nominated which was to be then cut to 45 for the game. As it turned out I think money and availability became the biggest force of attrition, which is what it is.


Having said all that, the theme that I see amongst all the problems is that Australian Gridiron is caught in the rut of representative teams, squads and tours being the beginning of the player development process, rather than the end of it.

Players go on tours and get selected to teams and then the realization occurs that they need to be working a lot harder to be competitive at the sport they claim to love and be devoted to. We're not providing pathways locally to improve these kids from the beginning.


TheEverlastingGodStopper
Post #18078
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 28/01/2009 10:34:56 PM
Forum Guru

Forum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum Guru

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/11/2011 2:40:56 AM
Posts: 56, Visits: 850
Could the fact be that we as coaches and administrators in Australia are behind the 8 ball in terms of our knowledge and skill set and as such pass this onto our junior players.  

Now we all do the best we can and put a great deal of effort into these guys but are we potentially the reason for this.

Hawkpeter, could the rut be as a result of coaches being unable to develop these players at a club level...should there potentially be an overhaul of the way coaches train their squads and look at making the level 1 and 2 more difficult with a set criteria to focus on development and identification of talent.  I think so, i think there is alot of potential for our country to be successful on the world stage, but not within the next 5 years and not at a senior level for 10 years.

At the end of the day, it was always going to be tough for the Australian junior side to be successful when they come into camp 4 days before the game with limited preparation and unfortunately not being able to field the best side possible with depth due to monetry constraints.  The trip was an incredibly expensive trip for alot of the players to afford. But never the less, they were competitive and gave it their all, that is the Australian way.

Post #18081
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 28/01/2009 11:39:38 PM
Forum Guru

Forum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum Guru

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2/12/2011 8:30:18 PM
Posts: 52, Visits: 417
To answer your question about developing players, there is no direct strategy from GA to develop players per se, there is no funding of a development squad or whatnot and such a thing is not economically feasible. GA lays out annual alternate year National Championships for each tier of the game and organizes National teams and Development tours. Having said that, if there were such a thing as a Development Squad or Academy, and this addresses the other aspect of being able to develop players; having the structure and impetus or the skills to do so, there is not enough knowledge of what it takes to prepare an athlete for football in the coaching community for it to be a success.

I'm not sure if I could put it any more crudely than the observation that fat ignorant coaches breed fat ignorant players.


But lets get to making things better. No country has a success model that we could directly transplant into our own country. We have to problem solve ourselves. As long as the sport is largely self funded mature aged players then I think we're going to continue as we have. Whats needed is greater effort by those individuals, not on their own game at the mature age level but on developing the younger age bracket below them. It would require largely acts of selflessness.


One thing worth examining is whether value for money is gained with international tours and development squads. These are significant leakages from the football economy and it cannot be a good thing for these to act as catalysts for player improvement, moving from sendentary football fan to dedicated knowledgeable athlete is not a one step process. Whilst it will always be hard to get good natural athletes to try our sport the ones that do come along to try it need to be immediately met by a strong culture of attention to physical preparation and mental aptitude for the game.


TheEverlastingGodStopper

Edited: 29/01/2009 12:45:16 AM by Hawkpeter
Post #18082
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 29/01/2009 6:05:21 AM
Forum Guru

Forum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum Guru

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 15/09/2010 1:57:37 AM
Posts: 50, Visits: 260
Hawkpeter I totally agree.

I do not think that we as a sport in Australia are putting together a focused effort to try and get better.

There is not enough unity in our country.

Some people play for fun, some coaches coach so they can drink beer with their buddies and smoke cigarettes at practice. Other coaches take alot of pride in what they do at club level.

The thing is that we have one Division of Senior Football and One Division of Junior Football and we have to cater for all levels of committment for  players & Coaches within that division.

The Fundamental issue with this is that a High Level Coach would only get frustrated with a Football Player that only wants to turn up to practice 50% of the time and not want to get any better. (Vice Versa)

For the record a respected Gridiron Coach in QLD just retired and went to coach Rugby League and the reason he did this is because he was not getting enough "gain for his pain" as there was some days that he would turn up to coach and their would only be 6 players at Practice.

So why does a coach with so much enthusiasm leave the Sport? it is because he is  dealing with players who just want to play Hit and Giggle Football.

Any coach who trys to set standards in this country gets shot down for being too hard. It is a pity that our sport is dominated by people who just want to play the game instead of playing the sport. yet these same people want to represent their state and country and brag about how good they are.

Then there are the coaches who think that being a good coach is by blowing smoke up everyones backside and telling them how good they are when in fact they are quite mediocre at best. I am not saying that coaches have to be hard on players but Please Be Honest...

 

I think the first thing we need to do is run a Survey on the bear website that monitors the standard of where the players and coaches want the Level of the  sport to be played at. Then we could ascertain what level of acheivement we want to aspire to.

eg

Division 1: Practice 3 times x a week, (2 practices and 1 Film session)
Off season Strength and conditioning Program which incorporates Strength,Power,Speed, Agility and Flexibility and even some skills camps. Also have a pre season  weekend camp with two a days.

Division 2: Practice 2 times a week, (1 practices and 1 Film session)
Off season Strength and conditioning Program which incorporates Strength,Power,Speed, Agility and Flexibility and even some skills camps.

Division 3: Practice 1 time a week, during season.

We have to stop trying to just get by and set some standards with concrete plans on how to get better.

Post #18084
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 29/01/2009 1:39:00 PM
Junior Member

Junior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 26/08/2009 11:04:28 PM
Posts: 10, Visits: 305
If we could get our game that serious it would be by now. Its going to be a slow process, but we have to attract better quality athletes at age 14-15 latest if they are to be worth anything at 17-18.

Also yes a lot of players are products of their coaches, but i don't think the Australian coaching squad was "fat and ignorant" there were a lot of good quality coaches there. Hell i think the fact it was close might have something to do with that...there seemed like an obvious disparity in terms of physical talent between the two teams.

Post #18085
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 29/01/2009 6:42:29 PM
Forum Guru

Forum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum Guru

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2/12/2011 8:30:18 PM
Posts: 52, Visits: 417
I doubt that a survey would lead to much, alternatively we have to decide how do we want to structure our sport for the incoming players, for those who have not started playing the sport yet, less so the ones who are already participating.

If the reality is that our Senior football is largely based on the commitment level decisions made by the players themselves then the only shot we have to form the habits we expect is at a Junior level.






TheEverlastingGodStopper
Post #18086
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 29/01/2009 6:57:48 PM
Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 1:49:21 AM
Posts: 242, Visits: 1,463
Hawkpeter (27/01/2009)
It seems that some people didn't get the information from their GA reps that the camp leading up to the game was for any player age eligible nominated by their club coaches and submitted to the Head Coach for consideration. The original camp had over 90 players nominated which was to be then cut to 45 for the game. As it turned out I think money and availability became the biggest force of attrition, which is what it is.

Please explain - I was asked for a list from our rep and I gave him 6 names, and only one of them was apparently sent off to the HC for consideration. 

Rock, my figures are from 1999 so I don't know what teams now do 10 years on by we did about 150 hours of actual practice, 1 hour of film per week during the season (which I know has gone up), and for those who did weight training outside of practice, that was 1hr 2-3x a week.  Maybe crazy teams in Texas pull that kind of stuff of a billion practice hours.  Didn't happen at my school.

Regarding the committment of players I'll say this:

It is up to the coaches to get their players to practice.  A good coach will instill a love of the game in the players to the point where they WANT to turn up each and every day.  A bad coach will make players think what's the point?  Now, obviously there are extenuating circumstances (bad weather makes everyone stay home), but by and large attendance at training is a reflection on the coach, rather than the players.

Further the coach has to be able to tell his players they won't play if they don't train.  It's really that simple.  The dedicated ones will show up while the part timers will gradually fall off.  Most often, those part timers are doing more harm than good to a program anyways, so it's best to cut the dead weight.  Tough but fair is the only way to deal with the situation, IMO. 

Now as for rep football:

Clearly, we all agree that the challenge of getting a team together to play well with a limited playbook is exceedingly difficult.  Therefore, I suggest the solution to be to nominate players a full year in advance of the tournament.  That will allow for two things:  Allow them time to get funds together AND allow for a few practices before the actual game.  While other players may make their way into the league later on, choosing the roster a year in advance gives people plenty of time to prepare.  The team can run a mini-camp over school holidays a few times a year to build the playbook and skills up.  It's not the ideal situation, but it has to be better than what's currently in place.

Post #18087
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 29/01/2009 7:22:01 PM
Forum Guru

Forum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum Guru

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/11/2011 2:40:56 AM
Posts: 56, Visits: 850
I think the problem is also what has been proven on this thread, there are alot of people with opinions and alot of different views on how this should be done, yet there hasnt been any two people say the agree with each other on how to improve.

One other issue we have to contend with is players playing other sport.  The dedication to being fit and active is there but the dedication to this sport is not because the sports these players (im looking at the junior level) have grown up with take precedent over everything else.  The nature of our game means that juniors can only start playing American football at 13-14years old. By that stage in what ever sport they are playing rep teams become a big part of their sporting career and so the transition to another sport to take it seriously becomes alot more difficult.  Every kid that i have coached over the years loves our sport once they are involved and making state sides, but they arent ready to dedicate themselves because they still have park footy on the Sunday.

I still believe an overhaul is required on the coaching techniques and practices however i also feel that we need to look at expanding our game.  I am aware that there are people out there who go out to schools and teach Flag football and basic level 0 training which is exactly what this sport needs. But as leagues we should maybe consider starting up flag football competitions from 8 year olds onwards.  It would be tough in the beginning not having any funding for marketing but this is probably the best way to build our sport up, my goal for this would be to make American football the primary sports focus rather than the secondary.

Post #18088
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 29/01/2009 7:28:12 PM
Forum Member

Forum MemberForum MemberForum MemberForum MemberForum MemberForum MemberForum MemberForum MemberForum Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 17/01/2012 12:04:55 AM
Posts: 27, Visits: 886
Video match report of the qualifier, for those interested.

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=Wh7CY9kdPbY

Post #18089
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 12/02/2009 7:15:23 PM
Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 1:49:21 AM
Posts: 242, Visits: 1,463
^

As much as I hate to kick a team while it's down, few things crossed my mind:

1.  That's pretty awful tackling by a team that's theoretically supposed to be made up of our finest junior players.  Shouldn't these guys be at least 3 year vets?  If so, shouldn't they be better than this?

2.  The AUS offense appeared to be running a triple option attack - If this was the case, I'm curious to know the logic behind running an offense that requires lots of practice and discipline when there was only apparently 4 days to prepare.

3.  Curious play calling on the goal line in that first fumble situation.  Apparently Australia had good field position all day but couldn't punch it in more than once.

I hate to be an armchair QB with only 3 minutes of game footage, and again it sounds like sour grapes, but with eveyone here posting things about the selection process and training etc - it seems to me that the Australian team maybe got outcoached?  Can people associated with the nationals team verify/explain exactly what happened?

Post #18162
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook


Similar Topics

Expand / Collapse

Reading This Topic

Expand / Collapse